Click on the slide!

James Gray

James Gray supporting the 'Save Our Supplements' campaign

James Gray supporting the 'Save Our Supplements' campaign

Click on the slide!

James Gray

James welcoming representatives of 19 Light Brigade to Parliament

James welcoming representatives of 19 Light Brigade to Parliament

Click on the slide!

James Gray

James Gray with Corporal Tony Pugsley of the Medical Wing at RAF Lyneham

James with Corporal Tony Pugsley of the Medical Wing at RAF Lyneham

Click on the slide!

James Gray

James pledging his support to the Royal British Legion's manifesto for the next General Election

James pledging his support to the Royal British Legion's manifesto for the next General Election

Regional Spatial Strategy

Further to the publication of Conservative green paper on planning (http://www.jamesgray.org/site/regional-spatial-strategy/open-source-planning-will-help-residents-shape-future-of-north-wiltshire.html), the following is a short note on my Party’s policies on travellers and unauthorised development. Conservatives believe in social responsibility. Different people, from different communities, should be free to lead their lives in different ways. But this freedom must come with a responsibility to the wider community. The vast majority of travellers accept this, but a very small minority do not.

Planning rules should ensure fairness, assessing the impact on the environment and amenity, irrespective of the applicant’s background. Councils have a role to ensure the provision of suitable authorised sites to tackle genuine local need for their area, in consultation with local communities. Yet Labour’s human rights laws, distorted equality rules and flawed planning guidance have created an unfair system which has worsened community relations. We reject Labour’s approach, and instead will:

  • Scrap John Prescott’s unfair Whitehall planning rules, which are compelling councils to build traveller camps on the Green Belt and to compulsorarily purchase people’s land to find sites.
  • Give tougher ‘stop notice’ enforcement powers to councils with authorised sites, and support the issuing of grants for councils to help build authorised sites.
  • The Human Rights Act will be replaced with a British Bill of Rights to prevent it being used to sidestep the planning system. The Bill of Rights will give greater clarity to the police and councils when taking decisions on planning and eviction.
  • Create a new criminal offence of intentional trespass, as already in place in the Republic Of Ireland. Trespassers who refuse to move after being asked to do so by a uniformed police officer will face arrest. At present, trespass (which does not involve criminal damage) is a civil offence - forcing the landowner to go to court. This will allow both squatters and travellers occupying property without permission of the landowner to be removed quickly.
  • Curtail the ability to apply for retrospective planning permission. This will stop the practice of travellers laying down concrete on weekends or bank holidays and then putting in a planning application (currently, planning enforcement cannot commence whilst an application is pending). Such a regime would not seek to penalise those who make genuine mistakes – such as householders trying to navigate through the often complex rules for building an extension.


These issues frequently lead to strong emotions on both sides in a local community. It is thus an area where the careful use of language and the right tone is especially important.

In conclusion, Labour’s changes have undermined community cohesion by creating a legitimate sense of injustice in the planning system. The British public want to see fair play for all, rather than special treatment being given to some. We will deliver a planning regime which is fair for all and stops the exploitation of the system by a few.

Open Source Planning - Conservative Policy Paper

Monday 1st March

North Wiltshire MP James Gray welcomed major new policies from Conservatives to reform England’s ‘broken’ planning system. A new system of ‘Open Source’ democracy and neighbourhood involvement will help deliver sustainable development across North Wiltshire. Whitehall targets and unelected quangos will be scrapped, to be replaced with collaborative working and new incentives to promote and reward local homes and jobs.

This comes as official Government surveys show only 1 in 3 people think they can influence decisions in their local area, and just 1 in 5 people think they can influence national decisions.

Under a new policy initiative, entitled Open Source Planning, Conservatives will:

  • Abolish the undemocratic and ineffective tier of regional planning overseen by unelected quangos. This would include scrapping the South West Regional Assembly and its so-called ‘Regional Spatial Strategy
  • Use collaborative democracy to allow local communities to create ‘bottom-up’ local plans, helping North Wiltshire’s residents shape and protect the character of their neighbourhoods.
  • Tackle the scourge of ‘garden grabbing’ and over-development in residential roads, giving Wiltshire Council new powers to protect the character of neighbourhoods.
  • Reward Wiltshire Council and communities through incentives to encourage building new homes and businesses, in contrast to the current regime where Whitehall effectively grabs back the money raised from new homes and business.
  • Maintain national Green Belt protection and other special protections for wildlife and the countryside, whilst allowing sustainable development elsewhere in accordance with the local plan.
  • Use new local infrastructure blueprints to coordinate strategic matters crossing boundaries, with a new duty on public authorities – including the Highways Agency and Network Rail – to cooperate with Wiltshire Council
  • Abolish Labour’s new unelected and unaccountable central planning quango – the Infrastructure Planning Commission, whilst retaining a fast-track process to avoid planning inquiries taking years; and give Members of Parliament a new role to vote on and ratify national planning policy.
  • Increase council and police powers to tackle unauthorised traveller sites and illegal trespass.
  • Change Whitehall’s restrictive parking rules to ensure more parking spaces are provided in family homes and near local shops, taking the pressure off crowded residential streets.


James Gray said: “The Government’s planning system is a source of immense frustration and concern for many residents across North Wiltshire. Under Labour, planning rules are too complex and too many decisions are taken by unelected officials, ignoring the views of local residents.”

“This bold new Conservative vision will put North Wiltshire’s residents in the driving seat to help shape our community, transferring power from Whitehall bureaucrats and Labour’s unelected regional quangos. This will help deliver new homes and jobs for North Wiltshire, whilst championing local democracy and protecting our local amenity and environment.”

[span class=download]Download: Open Source Planning Green Paper[/span]

Wiltshire 2026 - Planning for Wiltshire's FutureTraveller sites

We really have no idea at all of what demand there is for permanent or temporary traveller sites. Central Government has decreed that we need 4000 sites across England, but their logic is wholly bogus. As a result the unelected South West Regional Assembly, an organisation which a Conservative Government would abolish, came to the wholly unsupported conclusion in its so-called 'Regional Spatial Strategy' that we in North Wiltshire need 48 extra pitches (2 caravans each, so 96 caravans) plus 12 transit pitches; and that Wiltshire as a whole, including Swindon, needs to make provision for some 200 extra caravans. Says who?
I argued in my Commons debate that there should be a duty on local authorities to make suitable provision for local people - both the homeless by providing social housing, and for local travellers by providing encampments. Wiltshire already have 6 under their management, with a population of some 200 people. Do we really need to more than double that? Only local councillors should decide, not Central Government, and not unelected Regional Assemblies.

Housing

Equally it is local people, through their elected councillors, who should decide on the location of new housing. I have campaigned consistently against the westwards expansion of Swindon which would otherwise threaten to engulf Wootton Bassett, the Lydiards, Purton and Cricklade. It would be easy to allow Chippenham to sprawl northwards towards Junction 17, to encourage large “executive-style” housing in most of our more desirable villages and to permit lucrative “garden grabbing” developments. I will always be wholly opposed to any such thing, as I know are many residents of North Wiltshire. I have included my submissions to the consultation on 'Wiltshire 2026 - Planning for Wiltshire's Future' below. You can read further information and see the consultation document from Wiltshire Council by clicking here.

Response to the Consultation

18th December 2009

The Spatial Planning Team,
Economy and Enterprise,
Wiltshire Council,
County Hall,
Bythesea Road,
Trowbridge,
BA14 8JN.

Dear Sir,

I write in general terms to object strongly to very many of the proposals outlined in your document Wiltshire 2026 - Planning for Wiltshire’s Future. In particular, I do not accept that Chippenham should be a strategic site, nor that it should be required to provide 5,500 houses in the next 20 years. I similarly object to Calne being asked to provide 1155 houses, Malmesbury 718 and Wootton Bassett 912. None of that unwanted development seems to me to be sustainable.

I also object most strongly to the proposal that 3000 houses should be built on Ridgeway Farm or The Pry to the West of Swindon. These developments seem to me to threaten the vitally important green space between Swindon and the neighbouring small communities of Cricklade, Purton, The Lydiards and Wootton Bassett.

Leaving aside the detail, these housing projections are based on the flawed document known as the South West Regional Spatial Strategy. As you know, even the current Government have failed to provide a sound legal basis for this document. More important perhaps, Caroline Spelman MP, the Shadow Secretary of State for DCLG, is committed to abolishing the Regional Spatial Strategy and returning the right to decide on strategic housing numbers to local people. It seems to me quite wrong that Wiltshire Council should be considering progressing on the basis of the RSS, knowing that the likelihood is that the fundamental justification for it may very well be removed within months of now.

I would be grateful if you would register my strongest possible objections to the plans, and will happily expand on my objections if you would like me to do so.

Yours sincerely,

James Gray MP

--
26th February 2009

George Batten Esq.,
Director of Environmental Services,
Wiltshire County Council,
County Hall,
Bythesea Road,
Trowbridge,
Wiltshire,
BA14 8JD.

Dear Mr Batten,

I write in response to the Wiltshire County Council Public Consultation on the proposed 3000 new homes to the west of Swindon within North Wiltshire, proposed under the Regional Spatial Strategy.

I was disappointed not to be called to give evidence to the examination in public, despite my clearly expressed views on the subject, and was equally disappointed that the unelected South West Regional Assembly concluded that some 3000 houses should be built in my constituency, without any such consultation.

I should make my position plain. I take the view that there should be no further building of housing to the west or north of Swindon. The land which lies between Swindon and the towns and villages of Wootton Bassett, the Lydiards, Purton and Cricklade are vital to the preservation of those towns and villages, and I am determined that that green buffer should be preserved at all costs. The imposition of these 3000 houses by the unelected quango known as the South West Regional Assembly is wholly unacceptable in a democratic society.

The Conservative Party, which seems to stand some chance of forming a Government within the next twelve months, is committed to abolishing the South West Regional Assembly, and the Regional Development Agency and to rescinding the Regional Spatial Strategy, which seems to us to have no democratic legitimacy of any kind whatsoever.

It is therefore my strong view that no action should be taken in the meantime which might be irreversible in the event of there being a Conservative Government taking those actions. The people of North Wiltshire are wholly opposed to the building of these 3000 houses and I very much hope that both Wiltshire County Council and Swindon Borough Council will take note of those views.

Yours sincerely,

James Gray MP

More Articles...

Page 1 of 3

Start
Prev
1

Contact James


House of Commons Logo

Write:
James Gray MP
House of Commons
London
SW1A 0AA

Telephone:
0207 219 6237

Fax:

0207 219 1163

Email:
jamesgraymp@parliament.uk

You can also submit your enquiry online - click here.
This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it

Please provide your full name, address and a contact telephone number.

Follow James

facebook_button

twitter_button

James Gray MP on Flickr - visit my Flickr page at http://www.flickr.com/photos/40735969@N03/

James Gray MP on YouTube - visit my YouTube page at http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=james+gray+mp&search_type=&aq=f

Follow James Gray MP via TheyWorkForYou.com